Universals Archive

A database of proposed crosslinguistic laws and tendencies in grammar across the world’s languages. 2,029 published entries.

Advanced filters
1,237 entries · page 14 of 25
# Standardized / Original Domain Type Keywords
925 IF a syllabic consonant occurs in the phonological context X in root morphemes, THEN it occurs also in other morphemes, given that they contain the context X. phonology, morphology implication consonant, syllabic, root, morpheme
926 IF syllabic consonants are created by syncope in stressed syllables, THEN they have been created by stress in unsyncopated syllables. phonology implication consonant, syllabic, syncope, stress
927 IF stressed syllabic consonants become non-syllabic or are lost, THEN nonstressed syllabic consonants have become nonsyllabic or have been lost. prosodic phonology implication consonant, syllabic, stress
928 If a language contains syllables with vowel nuclei of the form CmVCn and syllables with consonantal nuclei of the form Cm'C§Cn', then m’ ≤ m, and n’ ≤ n. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that syllable, nucleus, vowel, syllabic, consonant
929 The source of syllabicity in syllabic consonants is always a vowel, either directly, when a vowel changes into a consonant (consonantalization), or else indirectly, when a vowel is lost and its syllabicity is transferred to a consonant (syllabic syncope). phonology unconditional syllable, vowel, syllabic, consonant, syncope
930 A consonant may become syllabic only if it is an adjacent margin of a syncopated vowel. phonology implication syllable, vowel, syllabic, consonant, syncope
931 If in a given context nasal-vowel (NV) sequences occur, and /u/ represents the highest back rounded vowel appearing in these sequences, then:

A. NV > N§ ⇒ mu > N§ or ˜u > N§, and
B. NVlow > N§ ⇒ NVnonlow > N§ ,
and similarly for contexts containing vowel-nasal sequences.
phonology implication nasal, vowel, high, back, syllabic, consonant
932 IF there are syllabic stops or affricates, THEN there are syllabic fricatives. phonology implication stop, affricate, fricative, syllabic, consonant
933 IF there are syllabic obstruents, THEN there will be syllabic s§ or s§‡ (given that there is nonsyllabic s or s‡). phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that obstruent, /s/, syllabic, consonant
938 IF there is extensive neutralization among the primary nasal consonants in other than prejunctural and/or preconsonantal positions, THEN there will be such neutralizations in prejunctural and/or preconsonantal positions as well. phonology implication consonant, nasal, neutralization
939 Secondary nasal consonants are, apart from borrowing and analogical formations, always the result of diachronic developments from clusters. phonology target < source consonant, nasal
940 IF there are nasal vowels, THEN there is at least one primary nasal consonant. phonology implication consonant, nasal, vowel
942 When there is extensive neutralization of nasal vowels with oral vowels, this occurs next to nasal consonants. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that consonant, nasal, vowel, oral, neutralization
943 Nasal vowels, apart from borrowing and analogical formations, always result from the loss of a Primary Nasal Consonant. phonology target < source consonant, nasal, vowel
944 A nasal syllabic phoneme, apart from borrowings and analogical formations, always results from the loss of a vowel. phonology target < source nasal syllabic, vowel
945 Nasalized vowels always arise from a sequence of vowel and nasal consonant origin. phonology target < source nasalized, vowel, nasal, consonant
946 IF there is a merger of oral vowels, THEN there is a merger of the corresponding nasal vowels if they exist. phonology implication oral, vowel, nasal, consonant
947 When nasal and oral vowels merge unconditionally, the result is always an oral vowel. phonology unconditional oral, vowel, nasal
948 When there is i and ü, i may originate from ü but not ü from i. phonology target < source high, front, vowel
949 The more a language is fusional, the more phonological rules are needed to serve morphological fusion. phonology, morphology implication fusion
952 IF direct and indirect/non-direct objects can be distinguished paradigmatically, THEN they can be distinguished syntagmatically as well, but not vice versa. inflection, syntax implication grammatical relations, object, indirect, non-direct, direct
953 IF direct and indirect/non-direct objects are distinguished in their coding, THEN they also differ in their syntactic behavior (but not necessarily the reverse). inflection, syntax implication grammatical relations, object, indirect, non-direct, direct
954 IF direct and indirect/non-direct objects are syntagmatically in any other kind of construction, THEN they are distinguished in all ditransitive constructions. inflection, syntax implication grammatical relations, object, indirect, non-direct, direct, ditransitive
955 IF direct and indirect/non-direct objects differ in their overt coding of whatever kind (at least minimally), THEN they will also differ in their syntactic behavior (at least minimally), but not necessarily vice versa. inflection, syntax implication grammatical relations, object, indirect, non-direct, direct
956 IF direct and indirect/non-direct objects differ in their morphological coding (at least minimally), THEN they will also differ in their syntactic behavior (at least minimally), but not necessarily vice versa. inflection, syntax implication grammatical relations, object, indirect, non-direct, direct
957 IF verbs of material transfer (giving and taking) and/or verbs of commanding exhibit anomalies with respect to the syntagmatic differentiation of objects, THEN verbs of information (telling and asking) will also be anomalous in this respect, but not vice versa.

IF verbs of information are anomalous in this respect, THEN verbs of teaching and examining will also be anomalous, but not vice versa.
inflection, syntax, semantics implication grammatical relations, object, ditransitive
961 IF there is a future tense resultative, THEN there is a past tense resultative.
IF there is a past tense resultative, THEN there is a present tense resultative.
inflection implicational hierarchy resultative, tense, present, past, future
964 Apart from remaining what it is, the numeral ‘one’ can only be reanalysed as an indefinite article (and/or pronoun). lexicon, syntax target < source numeral, indefinite, article, pronoun
967 IF articles co-occur with nouns accompanied by adnominal possessors, THEN demonstratives co-occur with them, too. syntax implication article, possessor, demonstrative
970 IF basic order order is OV, THEN plural words follow the noun.
IF basic order order is VO, THEN plural words precede the noun.
syntax implication order, verb, noun, plural word
986 IF there is locative comparative, THEN basic order is either SOV or SVO. syntax implication comparative, order, SOV, SVO
1002 IF a back nasal vowel is lowered, THEN the corresponding front nasal vowel is lowered as well. phonology implication nasal, vowel, back, front, low
1003 IF the illocutionary force is finality and assertion, THEN terminal intonation is low or falling.
IF the illocutionary force is non-finality or non-assertion, THEN terminal intonation is high or rising.
phonology, semantics implication intonation, illocutionary force
1008 IF a phoneme cannot occur at a word boundary, THEN it cannot occur at an utterance boundary either. phonology implication word boundary
1013 IF accent is on the third syllable from the left edge, THEN the system is not quantity-insensitive bound.

OR, BY CONTRAPOSITION:
IF the system is quantity-insensitive bound, THEN accent is not on the third syllable from the left edge.
prosodic phonology implication accent, stress, quantity, syllable
1017 IF there is a compact nasal consonant, THEN there are two diffuse consonants, one acute and the other grave. phonology implication consonant, nasal, compact, diffuse, acute, grave
1022 IF the parts-of speech system is of types 1-2/3, THEN basic word order is predicate-initial or predicate-final. syntax implication word class, order
1023 IF the parts-of speech system is of types 1-3/4, THEN there is no variation in the ordering of Subject and Predicate (unless the potential ambiguity arising from solved by morphological means). syntax implication word class, order
1024 IF the parts-of speech system is of types 1-3/4 and basic word order is Predicate-final, THEN there is ModifierHead basic word order within the term phrase (unless the potential ambiguity arising from a deviant order is solved by morphological means). syntax implication word class, order
1025 IF there is a parts-of speech system of types 1-3/4 and Predicate-initial word order, THEN there is HeadModifier basic word order within the term phrase (unless the potential ambiguity arising from a deviant order is solved by morphological means). syntax implication word class, order
1026 IF there is a parts-of speech system of types 1-3/4, THEN there is no variation in the order of Head and Modifier within the term phrase. syntax implication word class, order
1027 IF there is a parts-of speech system of types 1-2/3 and Predicate-final basic word order, THEN there is Modifier Head basic word order within the predicate phrase. syntax implication word class, order, head, modifier
1028 IF there is a parts-of speech system of types 1-2/3 and Predicate-initial basic word order, THEN there is Head Modifier basic word order within the predicate phrase. syntax implication word class, order, head, modifier
1029 IF there is a parts-of speech system of types 1-2/3 and Predicate-initial basic word order, THEN there is no variation in the order of Head and Modifier within the predicate phrase. syntax implication word class, order, head, modifier
1030 IF there is a dominant VSO order and the language has parts-of-speech system of types 1-3/4, THEN the adjective always follows the noun. syntax implication word class, order, VSO, adjective, noun
1033 It is these three features – stress, tone and length (with the possible addition of glottalization) – which function accentually and no others. prosodic phonology unconditional stress, tone, length, accent, glottalization
1034 Only the intense pole – loud stress, high pitch and length – ever has the accentual property. There is no language in which there is one and just one weakest stress or one lowest pitch (or shortest segment) in a phonological word. prosodic phonology unconditional stress, pitch, length, accent
1035 The climactic poles of the three accentual features tend to correlate with each other. Thus, e.g., where stress is predictable from vowel length, it is always the long degree which attracts stress. prosodic phonology mutual implication stress, vowel, length, accent
1036 Morphemically simple phonological words never have more than one main stress. phonology, morphology unconditional stress, accent
1037 When stress is phonologically predictable and automatic (i.e., always on the same syllable), it may only fall on initial, final, or penultimate syllables. prosodic phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that stress, syllable, accent
← Prev 1…1213141516…25 Next →