Universals Archive

A database of proposed crosslinguistic laws and tendencies in grammar across the world’s languages. 2,029 published entries.

Advanced filters
1,698 entries · page 32 of 34
# Standardized / Original Domain Type Keywords
1828 IF there is a labialized voiceless uvular ejective stop, THEN there is a voiceless uvular ejective stop. phonology implication stop, uvular, ejective, labial, voice
1829 IF there is a voiced pharyngeal fricative, THEN there is a voiceless pharyngeal fricative. phonology implication fricative, pharyngeal, voice
1830 IF there is a nasalized high back rounded vowel, THEN there is a high front unrounded vowel. phonology implication vowel, nasal, high, front round
1831 IF basic word order is SOV, THEN modifiers tend to come before nouns, most likely in nominalizations and with continuously decreasing likelihood with possessives, with relative clauses, and with attributive adjectives. syntax implication order, SOV, verb, subject, object, nominalization, noun, modifier, possessive, adjective, relative clause
1832 IF a relative clause or adjective precedes the noun, THEN possessives also precede the noun. syntax implication order, noun, modifier, possessive, adjective, relative clause
1833 IF there is a prenasalized labialized voiced velar stop, THEN there is also a prenasalized voiced velar stop. phonology implication stop, velar, labial, prenasalized, voice
1834 IF there is a prenasalized labialized voiced velar stop, THEN there is also a prenasalized voiced bilabial stop. phonology implication stop, velar, bilabial, labial, prenasalized, voice
1835 IF there is a laryngealized voiced palatal approximant, THEN there is also a glottal stop. phonology implication stop, approximant, palatal, glottal, laryngeal, voice
1836 IF there is a laryngealized voiced labial-velar approximant, THEN there is also a glottal stop. phonology implication stop, approximant, labial-velar, glottal, laryngeal, voice
1837 IF there is a breathy voiced bilabial stop, THEN there is also a breathy voiced velar stop. phonology implication stop, bilabial, velar, breathy, voice
1838 IF there is a voiceless palatal approximant, THEN there is also a voiceless labial-velar approximant. phonology implication approximant, palatal, labial-velar, voice
1839 IF there is a voiceless dental-alveolar nasal, THEN there is also a voiceless bilabial nasal. phonology implication nasal, dental-alveolar, bilabial, voice
1840 IF there is a voiceless velar nasal, THEN there is also a voiceless bilabial nasal. phonology implication nasal, velar, bilabial, voice
1841 IF there is a voiceless alveolar lateral ejective affricate, THEN there is also a voiceless alveolar sibilant ejective affricate. phonology implication affricate, lateral, alveolar, sibilant, ejective, voice
1842 IF there is a voiced palatal affricate, THEN there is also a voiceless palatal affricate. phonology implication affricate, palatal, voice
1843 IF there is a breathy voiced velar stop, THEN there is also a voiceless aspirated velar stop. phonology implication stop, velar, breathy voice, aspirated
1844 IF there is a voiceless palatal nasal, THEN there is also a voiceless bilabial nasal. phonology implication nasal, palatal, bilabial, voice
1845 IF there is a long raised low front unrounded vowel, THEN there is also a long high back rounded vowel. phonology implication vowel, round, high, low, long
1846 IF there is a palatalized voiceless dental-alveolar stop, THEN there is also a voiceless dental-alveolar stop. phonology implication stop, dental-alveolar, palatalized, voice
1847 IF there is a long raised low front unrounded vowel, THEN there is also a long high front unrounded vowel. phonology implication vowel, unrounded, low, high, front
1848 IF there is a long nasalized high front unrounded vowel, THEN there is also a long high front unrounded vowel. phonology implication vowel, unrounded, high, front, nasalized
1849 IF there is a breathy voice bilabial stop, THEN there is also a voiceless aspirated bilabial stop. phonology implication stop, bilabial, aspirated, breathy voice
1850 IF there is a breathy voice bilabial stop, THEN there is also a voiceless aspirated velar stop. phonology implication stop, bilabial, velar, aspirated, breathy voice
1851 IF there is a voiced dental trill, THEN there is also a voiceless dental stop. phonology implication stop, trill, dental, voice
1852 IF there is a breathy voice palato-alveolar sibilant affricate, THEN there is also a breathy voice velar stop. phonology implication stop, affricate, palato-alveolar, velar, sibilant, breathy voice
1853 IF there is a laryngealized voiced alveolar stop, THEN there is also a laryngealized voiced bilabial stop. phonology implication stop, alveolar, bilabial, laryngealized, voice
1854 IF there is laryngealized a voiced palatal approximant, THEN there is also the voiceless glottal fricative. phonology implication approximant, fricative, palatal, glottal, laryngealized, voice
1855 Vowels tend to be lower preceding non-laterals (trills or flaps) than preceding other consonants.
phonology implication consonant, liquid, nonlateral, trill, flap, vowel, phonotactics
1856 Vowels tend to be lower in the environment of a velarized lateral than in other environments.
phonology implication consonant, liquid, lateral, velarization, vowel, phonotactics
1857 When a vowel is adjacent to a nonlateral, it will be centralized or backed. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that liquid, nonlateral, centralization, back, vowel
1858 When a vowel is adjacent to a lateral, it will be fronted. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that liquid, lateral, front, vowel
1859 Languages tend to have laterals after grave consonants and nonlaterals after acute. phonology no genuine implication; rather: provided that liquid, lateral, acute, grave, consonant, vowel
1866 IF nasalization and nasal deletion occur in the context of high vowels, THEN it will have already occurred in the context of mid vowels.
IF nasalization and nasal deletion occur in the context of mid vowels, THEN it will have already occurred in the context of low vowels.
phonology implicational hierarchy nasalization, nasal deletion, vowel, low, high, mid
1867 IF there is a acute/grave opposition of compact nasal consonants, THEN there is an identical opposition of compact oral stops. phonology implication consonant, nasal, oral, compact, acute, grave
1868 IF reduplication is used for grammatical purposes in any other word class, THEN it is also used (for whatever purpose: gradation, superlative, intensification, distributivity, diminution, ...) for adjectives or adjective-derived nouns [perhaps rather: property words].
word formation implication reduplication, word class, adjective
1876 IF there is a 1st person exclusive dual, THEN there is also a 1st person inclusive dual. morphology implication inclusive, exclusive, person, 1, number, dual
1878 In the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses:
(a) If there is elimination of Aspect, then there is elimination of Tense and Mood.
(b) If there is elimination of agreement, then there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, or Mood.
(c) If there is case/adposition marking, then there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, or Mood.
(d) If there is possessor/oblique coding, the there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, Mood or Agreement.
syntax, inflection implication clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1880 Frequency hierarchy for the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses:
elimination of tense/aspect/mood >> elimination of agreement distinctions, omission of verb arguments >> case/adposition marking on the verb >> coding of verb arguments as possessor or obliques.
inflection, syntax implicational hierarchy clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1881 In the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses,
IF there is loss of subject-verb agreement and non-direct (but possessive/oblique) case
marking of the subordinate subject, THEN there is loss of tense/aspect/mood, but not vice versa
syntax, inflection implication clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1883 IF a verbal form inflects for tense-aspect-modality (TAM) like a predicated verb, THEN it will take subject and object dependents like a predicated verb.
IF a verbal form takes a subject dependent like a predicated verb, THEN it will take an object dependent like a predicated verb.
inflection, syntax implication deverbalization hierarchy, predicated verb, tense, aspect, mood, sunject, object
1884 IF there is an expletive subject, THEN there is some definite argument elsewhere in the clause. syntax implication clause, expletive subject, definite argument
1885 When there are different tense categories and there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person in one of these categories, IF such a split occurs in tenses other than future, THEN it will also occur in the future. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, tense, future, present, past
1886 IF there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person in the past, THEN there is such a split this split in the future too. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, tense, future, past
1887 IF there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person marking in modal categories, THEN it is more likely to occur in:
(a) optative than in indicative;
(b) irrealis than realis;
(c) volitional than involitional modality .
inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, mood, optative, indicative, irrealis, relais, volitional, involitional
1888 IF there is a split between 1st and 2nd person versus 3rd person marking, THEN it is more likely with a verb marked for direct or sensory evidence than verbs marked for indirect evidence, e.g. the widespread hearsay category. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, evidentiality
1889 IF there is a split between 1st and 2nd person versus 3rd person marking, THEN this split is more likely with the verbal category assertive than with the category non-assertive. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, assertive
1890 IF Object of Comparison can be clefted, THEN Genitive NP can be clefted as well.
IF Genitive NP can be clefted, THEN Oblique NP can be clefted as well.
IF Oblique NP can be clefted, THEN Indirect Object can be clefted as well.
IF Indirect Object can be clefted, THEN Direct Object can be clefted as well.
IF Direct Object can be clefted, THEN Subject can be clefted as well.
syntax implicational hierarchy cleft, subject, direct object, indirect, oblique, attributive, comparison
1891 The Cleftability Hierarchy:
Subject > Direct Object > Indirect Object > Oblique NP > Genitive NP > Object of Comparison.

Syntactic positions on the top of the cleftability hierarchy have more access to the deletion strategy and/or less access to the pronoun retention strategy.
syntax implicational hierarchy cleft, pronoun deletion, retention
1892 The Cleftability Hierarchy:
Subject > Direct Object > Indirect Object > Oblique NP > Genitive NP > Object of Comparison.

Syntactic positions on the top of the hierarchy can be clefted in a larger variety of sentences, or in more complex constructions than those on the bottom of the hierarchy.
syntax implicational hierarchy cleft, complexity
1893 IF there is an opposition of voice vs. voiceless and aspirate vs. non-aspirate, THEN there is a phoneme /h/. phonology implication aspirate, voice, /h/
← Prev 1…3031323334 Next →