Universals Archive

A database of proposed crosslinguistic laws and tendencies in grammar across the world’s languages. 2,029 published entries.

Advanced filters
789 entries · page 15 of 16
# Standardized / Original Domain Type Keywords
1683 Progressives (which develop from locative, postural or movement verb constructions) tend to develop into imperfectives or occasionally presents. inflection target < source aspect, progressive, imperfective, tense, present
1684 Anteriors (or perfects, which develop from stative auxiliaries plus a past participle, or from dynamic verbs such as ‘finish’ or ‘come from’) develop into perfectives or general past tenses. inflection target < source aspect, anterior, perfective, tense, past
1685 Habitual grams tend to come from verbs meaning ‘live’, ‘know’ or ‘be used to’. inflection target < source aspect, habitual
1686 In agreement conflicts due to conjuncts of different number and/or gender, IF there is number resolution, THEN there is also gender resolution, and vice versa. inflection, syntax mutual implication number, gender, agreement, coordination
1734 The phonological body of the definite article is never more substantial in adnominal use than in pronominal use. inflection, syntax implication definite article, pronoun
1735 The phonological body of any noun phrase constituent is never more substantial in adnominal use than in pronominal use. inflection, syntax implication NP, pronoun
1736 IF a noun phrase constituent has special adnominal and nominal forms for any of its more marked members, THEN it tends to have such forms for some or all of its less marked members. inflection, syntax implication NP, noun, pronoun, markedness
1737 IF the definite article carries any gender, number, and/or case inflection in adnominal use, THEN it carries at least the same inflection in pronominal use. inflection, syntax implication definite article, gender, number, case, pronoun, determiner
1738 IF a noun phrase constituent carries any gender, number, and/or case inflection in adnominal use, THEN it carries at least the same inflection in pronominal use. inflection, syntax implication NP, gender, number, case, pronoun, determiner
1740 IF an article is the sole carrier of gender and/or number and/or case, THEN it will co-occur with definite and generic nouns. inflection, syntax implication article, case, number, gender, noun, definiteness, generic
1741 IF a less peripherally ordered noun phrase constituent marks gender, number, and/or case redundantly, THEN all more peripherally ordered constituents can mark these categories redundantly. inflection, syntax implication NP, order, case, number, gender, agreement
1747 When there are any person affixes on the verb marking direct object, these will be prefixed with more than chance frequency.
inflection no genuine implication; rather: provided that person, direct object, verb, affix-order, prefix
1748 IF there are no overt articles, THEN non-specific direct objects fail to be accusative-marked.

IF there are no overt articles, THEN non-specific direct objects fail to be marked in the same way as specific direct objects.
inflection, syntax implication article, direct object, case, accusative, specificity
1759 IF person and/or number is marked on non-finite forms, THEN person and/or number is also marked on finite forms. inflection, syntax implication verb, finite, non-finite, agreement, person, number
1760 IF the subject of a non-finite form is nominative, THEN the subject of (at least some) finite forms will also be nominative. inflection, syntax implication finite, non-finite, subject, nominative case
1761 IF tense is marked on non-finite forms, THEN tense is also marked on finite forms. inflection implication verb, finite, non-finite, tense
1870 Baby talk has shorter sentences, fewer subordinate clauses, fewer grammatical relations, more repetitions than normal adult-to-adult speech, often omits inflections and function words, and the copula. inflection, syntax, discourse unconditional baby talk, complexity, subordination, copula
1877 Pronouns for 1st person inclusive plural may consist of 1st person plus 2nd person [singular] forms, but pronouns for 1st person inclusive dual may not.
inflection unconditional inclusive, person, 1, 2, number, dual, plural
1878 In the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses:
(a) If there is elimination of Aspect, then there is elimination of Tense and Mood.
(b) If there is elimination of agreement, then there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, or Mood.
(c) If there is case/adposition marking, then there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, or Mood.
(d) If there is possessor/oblique coding, the there is elimination of Tense, Aspect, Mood or Agreement.
syntax, inflection implication clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1879 In the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses:
(a) Case/adposition & agreement eliminated >> case/adposition marking & agreement maintained.
(b) Arguments omitted & tense/aspect/mood eliminated >> arguments omitted & tense/aspect/mood maintained.
(c) Arguments maintained & tense/aspect/mood eliminated >> arguments omitted & agreement maintained.
(d) Arguments maintained & agreement maintained >> arguments omitted & agreement maintained.
(where ‘>>’ means ‘is crosslinguistically more frequent than’)
syntax, inflection unconditional clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition
1880 Frequency hierarchy for the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses:
elimination of tense/aspect/mood >> elimination of agreement distinctions, omission of verb arguments >> case/adposition marking on the verb >> coding of verb arguments as possessor or obliques.
inflection, syntax implicational hierarchy clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1881 In the coding of subordination vis-a-vis that of non-subordinate clauses,
IF there is loss of subject-verb agreement and non-direct (but possessive/oblique) case
marking of the subordinate subject, THEN there is loss of tense/aspect/mood, but not vice versa
syntax, inflection implication clause combining, subordination, tense, aspect, mood, agreement, case, adposition, possessor, oblique
1882 Polarity [in gender/number systems] is never complete (i.e., polarity is never the sole configuration of gender/number markers under all circumstances in a given language). inflection, syntax unconditional gender, number, polarity
1883 IF a verbal form inflects for tense-aspect-modality (TAM) like a predicated verb, THEN it will take subject and object dependents like a predicated verb.
IF a verbal form takes a subject dependent like a predicated verb, THEN it will take an object dependent like a predicated verb.
inflection, syntax implication deverbalization hierarchy, predicated verb, tense, aspect, mood, sunject, object
1885 When there are different tense categories and there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person in one of these categories, IF such a split occurs in tenses other than future, THEN it will also occur in the future. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, tense, future, present, past
1886 IF there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person in the past, THEN there is such a split this split in the future too. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, tense, future, past
1887 IF there is a split between 1st versus 2nd/3rd person marking in modal categories, THEN it is more likely to occur in:
(a) optative than in indicative;
(b) irrealis than realis;
(c) volitional than involitional modality .
inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, mood, optative, indicative, irrealis, relais, volitional, involitional
1888 IF there is a split between 1st and 2nd person versus 3rd person marking, THEN it is more likely with a verb marked for direct or sensory evidence than verbs marked for indirect evidence, e.g. the widespread hearsay category. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, evidentiality
1889 IF there is a split between 1st and 2nd person versus 3rd person marking, THEN this split is more likely with the verbal category assertive than with the category non-assertive. inflection, syntax implication person, 1, 2, 3, split, assertive
1901 When at least some words of a particular word class are uninflected, words of that some word class that are borrowed must include ones which are equally uninflected.
inflection unconditional language contact, borrowing
1902 IF respect or social distance is distinguished for speaker (1st person) or other (3rd person) pronouns, THEN it is also distinguished for addressee (2nd person) pronouns. inflection, syntax, discourse implication speaker, addressee, social distance, respect, honorific
1903 Processess of variation of the type of pronoun used in reference for showing degrees of respect or social distance are more common in address than in reference to the speaker or to someone other than the speaker or addressee. inflection, syntax, discourse implication pronoun, personal pronoun, speaker, addressee, non-locutor, social distance, respect, personal pronoun, honorific
1904 IF respect or social distance is distinguished for plural pronouns, THEN it is also distinguished for singular pronouns.
inflection, syntax, discourse implication pronoun, personal pronoun, social distance, respect, honorific, number, singular, plural
1905 A pronominal form used for showing greater respect or social distance is never eliminated from the system of reference in favour of one for showing less respect or social distance. inflection, syntax, discourse unconditional pronoun, personal pronoun, social distance, respect, honorific
1907 IF a language is pivotless, THEN there will be isolating morphology and free word order. inflection, syntax implication semantic role, information flow, deixis, isolating, free word order, NP encoding
1908 IF a language is of the pure or the mixed separatist type of relational clause structuring, THEN there will be agglutinative morphology and free word order. inflection, syntax implication semantic role, information flow, deixis, agglutination, free word order
1909 IF a language is of the cumulative mixed type, THEN there will be fusional morphology or rigid word order. inflection, syntax implication semantic role, information flow, deixis, fusional, rigid word order, NP encoding
1910 IF there are syntactic relations, THEN there are diathesis changes (voices).
IF there are no syntactic relations, THEN there are no voices.
inflection, syntax implication syntactic relation, voice, diathesis
1911 When comitative and instrumental are kept formally distinct and if one of the two forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession, there is a 3:1 probability that it is the comitative that belongs to this pattern. inflection, sysntax no genuine implication; rather: provided that case, comitative, instrumental, predicative possession
1912 When the marker for instrumental forms part of the mode of expression of predicative possession, there is a 50% probability that comitative and instrumental are not distinguished by formal means. inflection, syntax no genuine implication; rather: provided that case, comitative, instrumental, predicative possession
1913 IF the grammatical expression of predicative possession requires the use of the marker of either comitative or instrumental, THEN in four out of five cases the comitative is involved. inflection, syntax implication case, comitative, instrumental, predicative possession
1914 IF the marker of predicative possession is allowed to be part of the range of functions covered by the marker of instrumental, THEN at least one additional function that is not equivalent to the comitative is involved in the combination. inflection, syntax implication case, comitative, instrumental, predicative possession
1916 IF there is an optative mood, THEN there is subjunctive or an imperative mood inflection, syntax implication mood, optative, subjunctive, imperative
1918 IF Dative/Benefative objects can be promoted to direct object, THEN other object cases lower on the topicality hierarchy may also be "promoted" to direct object — but always with obligatory verb-coding of the semantic role of the "promoted" object. inflection, syntax implication direct object, dative-shift, promotion
1919 IF basic order is VO, THEN the "promoted" direct object tends to be unmarked. inflection, syntax implication order, VO, direct object, dative-shift, markedness
1920 IF basic order is OV, THEN the "promoted" direct object tends to be marked. inflection, syntax implication order, OV, direct object, dative-shift, markedness
1921 IF there is polysynthesis, THEN there are no semantically significant determiners. inflection, syntax implication polysynthesis, determiner
1922 IF there is polysynthesis, THEN no more than a two-way contrast in definiteness, indefiniteness, genericity, and referentiality is conveyed by the bound pronominal affixes of agreement morphology alone. inflection, syntax, semantics implication polysynthesis, pronoun, agreement, definite, indefinite, generic, referential
1925 IF the verb in main clauses is inflected for subject or object agreement, THEN the verb in any sentence-like complement type will also be inflected for subject or object agreement. inflection, syntax implication verb agreement, subject, object, complementation
1926 IF verbs are inflected for tense and/or aspect, THEN there is an indicative-subjunctive distinction in complementation, and vice versa. inflection, syntax mutual implication tense, aspect, mood, indicative, subjunctive, complementation
← Prev 1…13141516 Next →